51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ

Six 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ campuses that currently provide funding for National Merit Scholarships, including 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Davis, will redirect that funding to other merit-based scholarships beginning with the fall 2006 entering class.

The decision, announced July 13, only affects National Merit Scholarships funded directly by the university; scholarships funded by the National Merit Scholarship Corp. or by corporate sponsors will not be affected. In addition, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ will continue to honor all National Merit Scholarships awarded to date, including those awarded to students entering the university in fall 2005.

In 2004-05, approximately 600 of 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ's 158,000 undergraduates received National Merit Scholarships funded by the university, totaling approximately $735,000.

The decision was reached collectively by the chancellors of the 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ campuses following a recommendation by the Academic Council, the executive body of 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ faculty members. The chancellors determined that the university should continue to reward and recognize academic merit, but that the specific definition of merit employed by the National Merit Scholarship Program is inconsistent with 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ's undergraduate admissions policies.

In particular, the chancellors agreed with the Academic Council's concern that using the PSAT exam alone to eliminate the vast majority of test takers from National Merit Scholarship consideration is inconsistent with 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ principles that standardized tests should be used in conjunction with other factors in measuring merit and that major decisions should not be made on the basis of small differences in test scores. In undergraduate admissions, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ uses a broad mix of indicators, including but not limited to test scores, to assess student achievement.

As a result, the six campuses currently using university resources to fund National Merit Scholarships will instead shift those resources to fund other merit-based scholarships, such as the 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Regents Scholarship Program and the campus-based Chancellor's Scholarship Programs.

In addition to 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Davis, the affected campuses are 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Irvine, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏLA, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ San Diego, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Santa Barbara, and 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Santa Cruz. 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Berkeley, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Merced, and 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Riverside already do not sponsor National Merit Scholarships.

"We honor and respect academic achievement, and we are very proud that many National Merit Scholars apply to 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ and are successful here," said M.R.C. Greenwood, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ provost and senior vice president for academic affairs. "This is an issue of ensuring that when the university uses its own resources to fund merit-based scholarships, it does so in a manner that is consistent with our own policies and principles."

None of 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ's public comparison institutions — the University of Virginia, University of Michigan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, State University of New York at Buffalo — or private comparison institutions like Harvard, MIT, Stanford and Yale currently sponsors National Merit Scholarships.

Students who are National Merit Scholars will still be able to compete for approximately $62 million in 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ scholarships currently awarded to 16,700 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ undergraduates.

In 2003-04, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ awarded a total of $11 million in Regents Scholarships to more than 2,100 students. In addition, 870 students received Chancellor's Scholarships in excess of $5.8 million. Recipients of these scholarships are selected based on merit, while the amount of funding they receive is based on financial need. In 2003-04, 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ also awarded $187.5 million in grants based solely on financial need.

The issue of 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ's sponsorship of National Merit Scholarships was first addressed by the 51³Ô¹ÏºÚÁÏ Academic Senate's Board of Admissions and Relations with Schools, which expressed concerns about the program's definition of merit and the university's definition; about the lack of a study validating use of the PSAT for selecting meritorious students; and about the program appearing to have a negative impact on disadvantaged and underrepresented students.

For more details, see .